送交者: 短评 于 April 21, 2008 14:21:40:
回答: 阶段性小结：围绕海外留学生和海外中资企业人士抗议ＣＮＮ，最响亮的一个声音是：你在美国感受到不公平待遇时，你至少可以合法地游行抗议，但如果你在中国受到不公平待遇时，你能合法地游行抗议？ 由 当然了，那类人肯定会说，＂我们的宪法本来就是保障公民合法集会、抗议的权力＂ 于 April 21, 2008 12:43:26:
华人在美国的抗议活动与当初黑人民权运动的根本区别是那些黑人都是土生土长的美国黑人，他们当初的游行抗议活动并没有受到任何非洲权力机器的指挥或操控，但最近的抗议CNN行动则是中共领事馆直接领导和操纵的－－－当然知道那些站在前台的不是中领馆的官员，而是这个同乡会和那个行业协会的积极分子. In English: If we compare the (local) Chinese protesting activity with the African American civil rights movement in the 1960s, the fundamental difference is: the African Americans all were native-born US citizens and their activities were neither engineered nor manipulated by the political machines back in Africa, while the Chinese protesting activities are totally planned and commanded by the local Chinese consulate officials---we certainly know that their front-ends are not the Chinese consulate officials but those tie-2's from the local Chinese associations.